Category Archives: News

Scandal? What Scandal?

On July 14, Mike Esposito, a record dealer form Phoenix, Arizona made public, via his Youtube channel, that Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab (MoFi), a mainstay of the analogue audiophile world, has been deceiving its customers for years (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtJRis-Ba1Q) … and no one noticed. According to Esposito MoFi has been sourcing many of its most coveted vinyl reissues since at least Sanatana’s Abraxas in 2008 from digital sources (quad DSD files) obtained mainly from Sony/BMG rights holders rather than from the original analogue master tapes. In the passionate world of audiophiles this news exploded like an atom bomb. Even the venerable Washington Post wrote an article about it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/music/2022/08/05/mofi-records-analog-digital-scandal/

To put this into perspective:

• MoFi nowhere claimed these records have been sourced without intermediate digital steps. So, MoFi have not violated any legal terms. And as a matter of fact, almost all vinyl issues nowadays are sourced from digital files. So it is absolutely standard procedure. However, given its PR and history, people simply assumed MoFi would cut its reissues directly from the original master tapes (AAA or triple A). So, it is more a question of being highly misleading in their communication than being outright fraudulent.
• This assumption of the market has in no small part been nurtured by the steep price premia MoFi charges for its LP reissues. Their Ultra Disc One-Step reissues cost about EUR 250,- in Germany. A normal MoFi LP about EUR 90,-. Such steep premia may be justified by the complex process of cutting a high quality vinyl reissue purely in the analogue domain from the original master tapes. For that requires a lot of special equipment, lengthy manual processes and getting access to the original master tape. If MoFi simply used a digital file (from a rights holder) to cut their LPs they are substantially reducing their costs and the prices they charge seem even more inappropriate.
• Importantly, these digitally sourced vinyl reissues (e.g. Santana’s Abraxas, Miles Davies’ Kind of Blue, Thelonious Monk’s Monk’s Dream or Bob Dylan’s Blood on the Tracks) sound as good as anything that MoFi has ever put out, according to acknowledged audiophile reviewers. So this is not about degraded sound quality. On the contrary, many of these experts thought these albums belong to the best sounding MoFi has ever issued. It is more about frustrated customer expectations, who – rightly or wrongly – expected a pure triple A analogue production. Many of the hard core analogue customers view any digital element as the devils work and cannot be consoled by the good sounding result.
• Even more: MoFi engineers are recognized industry experts and are credibly focussed on the quality of the end product. They are not dogmatic about the ways to achieve the best possible sound quality. And they have left no one in doubt that MoFi will continue and even extent its use of digital masters for LP production, because they are convinced that by doing so they can produce the best sounding LPs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shg0780YgAE)

Some Lessons:

As collateral damage there are a number of famous professional audiophile reviewers (I will not mention names) who have claimed for years if not decades to dislike what they call “digital sound” and that they can always tell the difference. These same reviewers raved about the high quality of the One-Step issues from MoFi for as long as they believed these records were produced triple A. So the revelation that these One-Steps are in fact sourced from digital files embarrasses them to the bone.

It is also most likely that the recent events at MoFi will shake the confidence in the marketing claims and production processes of other vinyl companies and force greater transparency about the provenance of music material.

One part of the scandal is MoFi’s deceptive market communications, which I think is condemnable in and of itself as well as a way to justify inflated prices, but I do not want to go into this. The other part touches on the relationship of analogue vs. digital technologies as a means of faithfully storing and manipulating sound information. The MoFi scandal puts into stark focus some questions that have been lurking in the background for a long time: What really are the qualitative differences, if any, between analogue and digital? And how noticeable are they? And is that passionately drawn borderline between the two technical alternatives really justified nowadays?

One thing seems clear: If some of the best experts in the industry globally – along with all the rest of the consumer world – did not notice any disadvantage in the sound quality of audiophile vinyl LPs produced from digital masters for more than 14 years, but on the contrary time- and-again lauded their analogue sound qualities, than one may conclude, that – properly done – the technology employed is simply not noticeable. Or in other words – if properly done – there are no sonic advantages of analogue music production over digital.

This should be a clear indication for even the diehard analogue disciples to rethink their prejudices and ask themselves whether they want to continue to exclude themselves from some of the best sounding music material for no good reason.

Hear for yourself how beautiful and analogue digital music can sound, if done properly: https://www.hifistatement.net/tests/item/2310-digitale-audio-systeme-hd-player-model-2

After 3 years of CORONA break, we finally can present ourselves to you again. Come, see and hear our much acclaimed digital players at the High End in Munich (19-22 May 2022)! We are exhibiting our Digital Players with the excellent gear of our partners Wiener Lautsprecher Manufaktur (WLM) and WayCables.

You will find us in the Atrium room A 4.1 E103 (1^st floor).

Reel-to-reel is the gold standard of analogue sound reproduction. Until the mid to late 1980ies all recordings were done on analogue tape. From the mid 80ies the industry switched to digital recording technology first on video tape, later on hard drives.

We love analogue sound and wanted to get a better understanding of the differences between analogue and digital sound reproduction – not from a technical perspective, but to get more details on “what are the sonic differences?”. To this end, we compared the same 1^st generation master tape copies on a DAS HD-Player Model 2 and a newly refurbished Revox PR99 MKII.

Not surprisingly, there were clear differences:

• The tapes sounded a bit fuller, more substantial – very pleasing
• The digital files sounded lighter, but also with more detail and precision. The digital files had a more airier treble and mid range. They also had more precision in the bass.
• The tapes had a smaller dynamic range than the digital files, but the background hiss was never a problem, not even in the quietest passages. It was just noticeable, but did not bother anyone. On the contrary, it had a relaxing effect.
• The tapes had beautifully open sonic space. The instruments were nicely spread out on the sonic stage. The sonic stage of the digital files was not quite as open as that of the tapes, but the spacial precision was better. With the digital files one could precisely pinpoint the location on the sonic stage; with the tapes it was a little less clear.

To sum up: The differences were small and along the lines of the expected. In general, the presentation with digital files sounded lighter, airier, also cleaner and at the same time more detailed and complex. The presentation with the tapes sounded a bit heavier and coarser and at the same time simpler. Both had serene open space.  The differences were not of the kind “better” or “worse”, but rather differences in taste. So depending on the types of music, those characteristics made sometimes the digital files and sometimes the tapes appear preferable.

With the introduction of stereophonic sound recording in the mid 1950s, RCA Victor produced milestones of recording history with its „Living Stereo“ label. Artists such as Jascha Heifetz, Arthur Rubinstein, Emil Gilels, Gregor Piatigorsky, Fritz Reiner, Charles Münch, Erich Leinsdorf, but also Henry Mancini, Harry Belafonte and Elvis Presley recorded their first stereo records with RCA Victor.

RCA engineers and producers – quality obsessed as they were – have given everything to prove what is possible with the new multi channel recording technology. They have produced exemplary recordings, which have set standards for high end music reproduction to this day.

In 2005 RCA Victor started to produce and publish high resolution copies of their original master tapes. We show you how these milestones in recording history fare in today’s digital music world.

Topics:

• History of the RCA Victor Living Stereo label
• Recording methods and technologies
• The most important artists and recordings

… of course, with lots of audio samples.

When:     Friday  September 18, 2020, 18:00h

Where:   Digitale Audio Systeme, Haus der Musik, Seilerstätte 30 / Ecke Annagasse, 1010 Vienna

Hosts:

As part of its celebration for its 50th issue in June 2020, Fidelity Magazin has published an article about Digitale Audio Systeme and its HD-Player Model 2:

Fidelity Magazin 50th Issue – DAS – Model 2_en